I’m surprised at just how much attention Imam Anwar al-Awlaqi is getting after the Fort Hood shootings. I’ve seen as much written about Imam Anwar as about the shooter, Nidal Hasan, which is bizarre given the relatively weak links between the two men. Lets not forget the extent of these links:
- Hasan prayed at the same mosque Anwar was the Imam of until around 7 years ago
- Hasan visited the same mosque again to attend his mother’s funeral prayer
- they exchanged a number of emails not exceeding 10 – over a period of six or seven YEARS!
- Hasan was previously investigated by the FBI for terrorist connections, and the conclusion of these investigations did NOT warrant his arrest
At the same time, Muslim organisations have been trying to outdo each other in who can distance themselves the most from al-Awlaqi, with JIMAS being one of the worst examples, issuing a statement on their website which concludes:
“JIMAS has decided to completely remove any and all promotion of Anwar Al-Awlaki through his talks and CDs that were available through us. Furthermore, we urge all Muslim organisations and groups to do the same.”
The full statement is available here.
I look at individuals and organisations who engage in this sort of behaviour as losers in two ways:
The first is that regardless of how much they try to distance themselves from al-Awlaqi, that past association will continually be brought up to smear them. Take for instance this article published on Spittoon which berates Inayat Banglawala for being unaware of al-Awlaqi’s jihadist tendencies despite Banglawala distancing himself from al-Awlaqi just a few days earlier. They’ll wash their hands of their brother but they still won’t get the level of acceptance that they crave.
The second is potentially earning the anger of Allah for completely disavowing themselves of a fellow Muslim. Have they forgotten the ayaat and the hadith on Islamic brotherhood?
——-
Returning to Inayat, who remembers Inayat’s articles in support of gay rights in the Guardian? And also inviting Pete “Gay Grandmaster of the UK” Tatchell onto Islam Channel? Well, that same Pete Tatchell who he is good buddies with is a confirmed speaker at this weekend’s Rally Against Shari’a.
I try not overdo the guilt by association thing, but come on Inayat! He is going to Rally Against Shari’a? Does that not ring any sort of alarm bell to you?
I wonder if Inayat wouldn’t mind also sharing a platform with BNP leader Nick Griffin, who afterall, openly admits to liking Islam’s stance against usury. So you see, we even have some common ground with him to work from.
——–
Finally, it constantly amazes me when i read statements like the following in response to Muslim Matters latest post entitled “Letters to Dr. Seuss”:
“Masha Allah, this was a very beautiful thing the Shaykh’s wife did. It shows we can work together with the Non-Muslim community to build a better society.”
Well no shit Sherlock, who turned on the light there? Who could ever have guessed that Muslims and non-Muslims could work together? Not me!
On a serious note, which planet have some Muslims been living on that ever gave them the idea that Muslims and non-Muslims were unable to get on with each other and help each other out?
And when the penny finally drops and they realise they can its like “WOOOOOOWWWW”.
Anyhow, i’m out of here…